TR Editors' blog
Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.
Blog Topics
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- ...
: Interesting article. I think what is really important is whether or not the software could keep...
- prattner
: The medical establishment is careful to the point of cowardice with these drugs, which could do...
- Gaetano...
: .exactly 13 months ago, I've predicted the release of a $99 "Web based" (that now, "cool people"...
- gblaze44
: I agree, also with amniotic fluid and placental tissue stem cells, there really is no need to use...
- shomas
: Pluripotent stem cells have a greater long term potential then embryonic stem cell anyways, and...
|
Monday, August 30, 2010
NIH Halts All Internal Embryonic Stem-Cell Research
The federal agency makes an unprecedented decision in response to last week's federal injunction.
The National Institutes of Health, the nation's largest biomedical funding agency, halted all ongoing research at the agency that involves human embryonic stem cells. The order comes in response to a federal injunction issued last week blocking use of federal funding for the research. (See my story, New Court Ruling Could Cripple Stem-Cell Research, for more details.)
According to Science Insider:
According to a furious NIH staffer who read the e-mail to ScienceInsider over the telephone, this morning's message from NIH intramural research chief Michael Gottesman states: "HHS [the Department of Health and Human Services] has determined that the recent preliminary injunction ... is applicable to the use of human embryonic stem cells in intramural research projects. In light of this determination, effective today, intramural scientists who use human ES cell lines should initiate procedures to terminate these projects. Procedures that will conserve and protect the research resources should be followed." The agency has eight research projects that use hESCs, most if not all of which use lines approved under the Bush Administration, say NIH officials. It also has a unit that characterizes lines added to the NIH registry of approved hESC lines. The shutdown is the first immediate halt to research since Lamberth issued the preliminary injunction. NIH Director Francis Collins has said that extramural researchers can continue their projects for now and that the injunction will affect only future grant payments. ("Intramural" means researchers in labs on the NIH campus; "extramural" refers to researchers at universities and other outside institutions who receive NIH grants.)But some biomedical research lobbyists worry that that interpretation of the ruling may have been too optimistic, and a shutdown of all ongoing NIH-funded hESC research could be imminent. The Department of Justice is expected to ask the courts to stay the injunction as soon as today, an NIH source tells ScienceInsider.
Friday, July 30, 2010
FDA Lets Human Embryonic Stem Cells Trials Resume
Geron will begin tests of its therapy for spinal cord injury. Advanced Cell Technology hopes to follow with a stem cell treatment for blindness.
The Food and Drug Administration has cleared Geron, a stem cell
company based in Menlo Park, CA, to move forward with clinical tests of its experimental cell therapy for
spinal cord injury, which is derived from embryonic stem cells. The company, which has
been working on cell based therapies for the last decade, first won permission to
begin clinical testing in January of 2009. But the trials were put on hold last
August due to new safety concerns from animal tests. The clinical trial marks the first human tests of a therapy derived from embryonic stem cells.
The cell therapy, called GRNOPC1, is made by transforming
embryonic stem cells into oligodendrocytes--a type of brain cell that wraps
itself around neurons, forming a fatty insulation layer that allows electrical
messages to be conducted throughout the nervous system. In many spinal-cord
injuries, these cells are damaged, but the underlying nerve cells remain
intact. The new cells are then injected into the site of the injury, coating
exposed nerves and restoring communication to the nervous system.
As I noted in a previous post:
Scientists published the results of a successful study
testing the therapy in animals in 2005, showing that paralyzed rats injected
with the cells were able to walk again. Since then, Geron has been conducting
numerous studies intended to show the safety of the cell-based therapy, as well
as developing production methods that would make the cells as easy to use as
more traditional treatments. Geron researchers have also developed a way to
reliably freeze and thaw brain cells, so that they can be manufactured in a
central location, and then shipped to the hospitals where they will be used.
According to a statement
from Geron:
The clinical hold was placed following
results from a single preclinical animal study in which Geron observed a higher
frequency of small cysts within the injury site in the spinal cord of animals
injected with GRNOPC1 than had previously been noted in numerous foregoing studies.
In response to those results, Geron developed new markers and assays as
additional release specifications for GRNOPC1. The company completed an
additional confirmatory preclinical animal study to test the new markers and
assays, and subsequently submitted a request to the FDA for the clinical hold
to be lifted.
Advanced Cell Technology, a stem cell
company based in Marlborough, MA, hopes to follow Geron. The company announced this week that it has submitted new
materials to the FDA in regards to its application, first filed in November, to
begin clinical trials of a cell therapy for patients with Stargardt's
Macular Dystrophy, an inherited eye disease.
Wednesday, December 02, 2009
New Stem Cell Lines Eligible for Federal Funding
For hundreds of scientists, embryonic stem cell research takes a step into the present.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced today that 13 new
embryonic stem cell lines are now eligible for federal funding. That means that
scientists with NIH grants can study embryonic stem cells derived using newer, more refined methods generally considered to be superior to
the older ones. Ninety-six additional lines are also now under review.
"Those
were early days in the science of stem cell research, and much has been learned since
then," said NIH director Francis Collins in a press conference on Wednesday, referring to the stem cell lines, created before 2001, that had previously been eligible for federal funding. "In the last eight years, hundreds of embryonic stem cell lines have been
derived using non-federal funds, many of them carrying more favorable characteristics."
As I wrote in a previous story:
Using
only the old lines is like "being required to use Microsoft Word
1998," says Jeanne Loring, director of the Center for Regenerative
Medicine at the Scripps Research Institute, in La Jolla, CA.
The earlier lines were
derived using animal products, making them largely unfit for therapeutic use.
"There are hundreds of embryonic stem-cell lines out there that have been
made under the best conditions, and some of them are patient ready," says
John Gearhart, director of the Institute for Regenerative Medicine at the
University of Pennsylvania, in Philadelphia. "They have greater utility,
performance, and safety than [the Bush-approved] lines."
The announcement follows President Obama's executive order
made last March, enabling government support for embryonic stem cell research.
That order overturned a previous one by President Bush in 2001, limiting
federally-funded research to a set of existing cell lines. The 2001 decree
forced scientists who wanted to create and use new stem cell lines, derived
from leftover IVF embryos, to garner private
funding.
Eleven of the 13 new lines were generated in George Daley's lab
at Children's Hospital, in Boston, which used private funding to make them.
According to the New York Times, "Dr. Daley said that private financing had
been drying up and that he was eager to start research on the now-approved cell
lines with the help of his federal grant money." Researchers still cannot
derive new lines using federal funds--creating new lines requires the
destruction of an embryo.
|
 |
Current Issue
- The TR35
- Our annual selection of the world's top innovators under the age of 35.
|
More Technology News from 
|